The first part of the title is in quotes because it is the title of tonight’s episode of Our America, Lisa Ling’s journalistic documentary series. I can not say enough about how moving, thoughtful, and brilliant this new show is. I look forward to it every week! Ling brings such sensitivity, curiosity, and authenticity to the exploration of different groups of Americans that are often invisible or overlooked. It’s one of the few shows on TV right now that I actually recommend to others.
The second part of the title signifies my attempt to articulate my views on this exceedingly divisive issue within the contemporary church. I’ve been meaning to write about this for a while now (as part of my horrendously long and drawn out series of “Reconsideration” posts). Today seems like a good day for it.
This is not the first time I’ve written about the tenuous relationship between the LGBTQ community and the church…and certainly not the first or last time I’ll think about the issue. It’s a complex and spirited issue for those within and without both the LGBTQ and Christian communities. I think the discourse often does an injustice to the complexity of the issue. And I’m sure my post will too. But, really I think that there are two starting points from which we can begin (and perhaps a third if you have epistemological dilemmas like I do). Whatever the starting point, I think the endpoint is ultimately the same when considering two guiding questions: 1)Should gays be allowed to participate in the life of the church? and 2)Should gays be required to change their sexuality?. So let’s trace it.
Starting point # 1: Sexualities other than heterosexuality are sinful.
(Important note here. There are a number of homosexuals/bisexuals who agree with this! So it is not strictly a “straight vs. gay” starting point.)
1) Should gays be allowed to participate in the life of the church?
Well, I should hope so! In fact, I believe there are probably very few churches that would tell a gay person that they cannot come to church services, Bible studies, fellowship gatherings, etc just because they are gay. The church should (and often does) welcome all who are seeking the Lord.
2) Should gays be required to change their sexuality?
This is major. Those that believe non-heterosexuality is sinful–and particularly those with a robust theology of repentance–will have expectations surrounding this question. I think churches at this starting point will, sooner or later, expect the gay person to either change their sexual orientation or silence that aspect of their identity and live a celibate life. They want to see transformation. And if that transformation doesn’t happen soon enough…then all sorts of doubts arise about the authenticity of conversion or their devotion to following the Lord.
Hmmm…okay…
Starting point #2: Sexualities other than heterosexuality are acceptable.
Again, the line separating proponents and opponents zig-zags through both the LGBTQ community and Christian community. Complex.
1)Should gays be allowed to participate in the life of the church?
From this starting point, there would be no reason for their exclusion.
2) Should gays be required to change their sexuality?
Again, if their sexuality is acceptable, there is neither the expectation or requirement for them to change.
So far, these two starting points have not arrived at the same endpoint. But there is a third question that I think gets them there, and it is this: Who is responsible for an individual’s transformation?
It is my conviction that true transformation of the heart and will is something that only God can accomplish. If you have ever seriously warred with yourself over some personal characteristic with which you are displeased, then you know the struggle. For me, the taming of my tongue has been and continues to be a supernatural act of God! It is true that some people have “prayed the gay away” and walked away from that life. And it is also true that some have not, despite diligent prayers.
I am SO convinced that there are some things that only God can change (if He sees fit to do so). And we cannot impose a timeline on His work. So whether we think it is sinful or acceptable, whether we think they should change or be affirmed as they are, I think the real task of the church is to trust God to do His job. To convict, to convert, to sanctify, to heal, and to redeem. Not just “them”…but us too. And it is our job to love and accept all weary sojourners on the quest toward a more meaningful, more faithful, more Jesus-full life.
For me, the question of whether or not non-heterosexuality is acceptable has become irrelevant. Whether it is or it isn’t, I cannot change another person. Whether it is or it isn’t, sometimes people can’t even change themselves. Whether it is or it isn’t, our response ought to be the same….to graciously accept each other as we grow in our faith, AND LET GOD DO THE REST!